Posted on: October 6th, 2017 Phlsphy of Rlgn: Starting Points
If I were to teach an intro to philosophy of religion course (which I’d love to do), I would approach the course in the following way:
I. God according to “Natural Reason.”
A. Parmenides on Simple Being.
B. Aristotle’s Qualified “hi-5” to Parmenides.
• “P., you think you’re describing “Being,” but really you’re describing God.”
• “Yes, ultimate reality is simple, but we must respect sense perception.”
C. From Aristotle to Plotinus. Teasing out threeness from Divine Oneness.
II. God (& creation) according Revelation (or the Hebrew Scriptures).
A. Tautologies & Jewish Jibberish: “I am what I am”. Huh?!?
B. The opposite end of the cosmological spectrum from God: the tôhu vbôhu, terra vacua et inanis of Gen. 1:2. Sounds like “prime matter,” devoid of form & logos.
III. Putting it all together, both legacies fulfilled: the logos becomes flesh.
Comments are closed.