Comments on: Ancient Interpretation: Reno on Origen’s “Inconclusiveness’ http://www.religiocity.org/2009/08/04/923/ political theology in the city Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:11:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: matt http://www.religiocity.org/2009/08/04/923/#comment-75567 matt Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:32:30 +0000 http://www.religiocity.org/?p=923#comment-75567 Thanks, David. I want to know more about her view. It is quite interesting that the _sensus litteralis_ does map quite nicely onto what moderns sometimes call "the grammatical-historical" meaning. Gives me slightly more appreciation for Dallas Theo. Seminary. Thanks, David. I want to know more about her view.

It is quite interesting that the _sensus litteralis_ does map quite nicely onto what moderns sometimes call “the grammatical-historical” meaning.

Gives me slightly more appreciation for Dallas Theo. Seminary.

]]> By: David http://www.religiocity.org/2009/08/04/923/#comment-75565 David Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:33:59 +0000 http://www.religiocity.org/?p=923#comment-75565 Dr Christine Frost offers a unique way of approaching the text that unites the Antiochian and Alexandrian approaches: Scripture is iconic: a window allowing the material to point beyond itself to the divine. The historical-grammatical is the material that 'controls' (or perhaps supplies would be better) the vision of the beyond. Its very incarnational of course and, I think, bears exploring. Dr Christine Frost offers a unique way of approaching the text that unites the Antiochian and Alexandrian approaches: Scripture is iconic: a window allowing the material to point beyond itself to the divine. The historical-grammatical is the material that ‘controls’ (or perhaps supplies would be better) the vision of the beyond.
Its very incarnational of course and, I think, bears exploring.

]]>