<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ++Rowan on Scripture (Theology Class #2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.religiocity.org/2009/02/17/rowan-on-scripture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.religiocity.org/2009/02/17/rowan-on-scripture/</link>
	<description>political theology in the city</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: religiocity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Liturgical View of Scripture (II): (Philosophy of) Time</title>
		<link>http://www.religiocity.org/2009/02/17/rowan-on-scripture/#comment-73557</link>
		<dc:creator>religiocity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Liturgical View of Scripture (II): (Philosophy of) Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religiocity.org/?p=569#comment-73557</guid>
		<description>[...] Conversations take time. This fits perfectly with my Vosian understanding of Pauline eschatology. Conservatives look at this posture within Anglicanism and call it “neverending indeterminacy” because they want something given, something spatialized, something fixed, static and stable, some kind of original autographa. Over and against that, what liturgical traditions are really showing is that our life (which is liturgical), that is, our reading of Scripture, takes place in a temporality which is analogous to the temporality of the biblical narrative (as Rowan Williams argues here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Conversations take time. This fits perfectly with my Vosian understanding of Pauline eschatology. Conservatives look at this posture within Anglicanism and call it “neverending indeterminacy” because they want something given, something spatialized, something fixed, static and stable, some kind of original autographa. Over and against that, what liturgical traditions are really showing is that our life (which is liturgical), that is, our reading of Scripture, takes place in a temporality which is analogous to the temporality of the biblical narrative (as Rowan Williams argues here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynthia r. nielsen</title>
		<link>http://www.religiocity.org/2009/02/17/rowan-on-scripture/#comment-73436</link>
		<dc:creator>cynthia r. nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religiocity.org/?p=569#comment-73436</guid>
		<description>Nice post, Matt.  I've added Williams' book to my Amazon wishlist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Matt.  I&#8217;ve added Williams&#8217; book to my Amazon wishlist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
